Love and technology; new paradigm of relations
And there we reviewing the phone every minute looking if there is love or there is wifi, what you find first. (anonymous).
New technologies have accelerated changes in patterns of relationships now is not so common to find in a cafe, but in a chat room from multiple social networks. Enablers are new instruments of interpersonal relationships. Therefore we learn new languages: app; summarize in 140 characters and in particular interpret the emoticons or "emoji" their meanings; they mean the faces ?, or the monkey covering his eyes ?.
A new language appears. And we are trying out new symbolic to express accept or accepted forms; or the famous likes; with anxiety or anxiety that it brings. The changes brought by technology are a fast highway, and do not have the time to adapt what they have learned; because in our brain where there is already a mapping we go to find that record that make us recognize when we feel pleasantly well with one person or another.
This new relational model requires new adaptations for those not born in the world 2.0; a challenge that is not only relational. For when you learned to use the facebook appeared four new applications, and the latest acquisition: the Snapchat that for generations 30 years up almost impossible. However for teens it is fabulous because it allows an infinite number of non-verbal expressions; symbolic, and therefore symbolized naturalized between them.
That question opens these technologies? the same as ever; as historic as historicized; and it has to do with the other, closer to the other. Before the Internet and social networks we relate; we are connected or disconnected today. This model involves the idea probably less commitment or a more flexible commitment, which allows or may not be in contact with the other; for mid devices. Links are more quantitative than qualitative as social networks have expanded amount at the expense of quality.
Having overcome the first instance of communication, which is generally more relieved through text or audio; there is something in the order of being barricaded behind a digital backup. It is less difficult to overcome this digital medium with respect to approach someone personally. The rejection seems less rejection if digital. The question that I put into consideration here is: a person can know only by the communications exchange ?. In this is a feeling attracted by what I believe is the person who is really so. The reality has not yet been imposed on us in regard to new link. In terms of feelings and emotions. What happens when we know a person ?, what happens in our body and brain ?. It detects the stimulus, recognizes and there unfolds a battery of sensations and feelings expressed by the body and the brain has recognized through this emotional map built in the course of our lives. Emotions play a key role as we take to do or not do, influence our decisions and impact on memory and learning. We have built a library of emocionalidades, to which we will seek the answers to what happens to us because we need an explanatory system that alleviates uncertainty.
Each of the reactions have been influenced by family patterns, social behaviors, those models more efficient relationship we have been able to design, but of course, this is not conscious. Humans react most of the time unconsciously and therefore also influenced by the context, to which must be added the digitization of relationships. Today we have multiplied the means by which we communicate emotions.
We connect with that person through any device, in any app mediator between us and the pleasure or displeasure that this holds for us. Certainly there are relationships that initially were virtual and then could not adapt to the virtuality and are successful. Nothing is quite concerning that emotionality and technology; and certainly the field of virtuality opens a new perspective on relationships and ways of understanding the links. Virtuality of relations brings certain advantages, one is less exposed because the rejection seem to lose impact if it is said by message, it seems that it is less culpable than if verbalized in a one to one. The presence across the screen frees us from the personal presence.
Not suitable thinking like two different fields and virtual reality; so thin that line has been dissolved from the naturalization of this communication and relational model. Today is all one; there is no separation between virtual and real. It is what the subject lives; matters whether virtual or not. It is what happens and takes place in both reality.
New technologies have accelerated changes in patterns of relationships now is not so common to find in a cafe, but in a chat room from multiple social networks. Enablers are new instruments of interpersonal relationships. Therefore we learn new languages: app; summarize in 140 characters and in particular interpret the emoticons or "emoji" their meanings; they mean the faces ?, or the monkey covering his eyes ?.
A new language appears. And we are trying out new symbolic to express accept or accepted forms; or the famous likes; with anxiety or anxiety that it brings. The changes brought by technology are a fast highway, and do not have the time to adapt what they have learned; because in our brain where there is already a mapping we go to find that record that make us recognize when we feel pleasantly well with one person or another.
This new relational model requires new adaptations for those not born in the world 2.0; a challenge that is not only relational. For when you learned to use the facebook appeared four new applications, and the latest acquisition: the Snapchat that for generations 30 years up almost impossible. However for teens it is fabulous because it allows an infinite number of non-verbal expressions; symbolic, and therefore symbolized naturalized between them.
That question opens these technologies? the same as ever; as historic as historicized; and it has to do with the other, closer to the other. Before the Internet and social networks we relate; we are connected or disconnected today. This model involves the idea probably less commitment or a more flexible commitment, which allows or may not be in contact with the other; for mid devices. Links are more quantitative than qualitative as social networks have expanded amount at the expense of quality.
Having overcome the first instance of communication, which is generally more relieved through text or audio; there is something in the order of being barricaded behind a digital backup. It is less difficult to overcome this digital medium with respect to approach someone personally. The rejection seems less rejection if digital. The question that I put into consideration here is: a person can know only by the communications exchange ?. In this is a feeling attracted by what I believe is the person who is really so. The reality has not yet been imposed on us in regard to new link. In terms of feelings and emotions. What happens when we know a person ?, what happens in our body and brain ?. It detects the stimulus, recognizes and there unfolds a battery of sensations and feelings expressed by the body and the brain has recognized through this emotional map built in the course of our lives. Emotions play a key role as we take to do or not do, influence our decisions and impact on memory and learning. We have built a library of emocionalidades, to which we will seek the answers to what happens to us because we need an explanatory system that alleviates uncertainty.
Each of the reactions have been influenced by family patterns, social behaviors, those models more efficient relationship we have been able to design, but of course, this is not conscious. Humans react most of the time unconsciously and therefore also influenced by the context, to which must be added the digitization of relationships. Today we have multiplied the means by which we communicate emotions.
We connect with that person through any device, in any app mediator between us and the pleasure or displeasure that this holds for us. Certainly there are relationships that initially were virtual and then could not adapt to the virtuality and are successful. Nothing is quite concerning that emotionality and technology; and certainly the field of virtuality opens a new perspective on relationships and ways of understanding the links. Virtuality of relations brings certain advantages, one is less exposed because the rejection seem to lose impact if it is said by message, it seems that it is less culpable than if verbalized in a one to one. The presence across the screen frees us from the personal presence.
Not suitable thinking like two different fields and virtual reality; so thin that line has been dissolved from the naturalization of this communication and relational model. Today is all one; there is no separation between virtual and real. It is what the subject lives; matters whether virtual or not. It is what happens and takes place in both reality.
0 comments: